> thanks. no, i don't think ricardo disagrees. never thought he disagreed
> on weber. i replied, buttressing his argument. he interpreted me as
> misusing the concept of rationality. i corrected him. ricardo, you think
> i'm being rude, yes?
I did not say you were misusing the concept. I was simply trying to
make sure we were in agreement about the meaning of formal
rationality. Over and over people confuse Weber's four types, as
Yoshie has done today in her indentification of formal rationality
with mathematics.
