Smaller groups get to know the drill

Shrinking natural gas reserves in the US and mergers between larger
companies are helping to drive a new wave of consolidation

Financial Times, Sep 28, 2001
By SHEILA MCNULTY

As Texaco prepares to merge next month into the history books - its
100-year history swallowed up by Chevron - the smaller and less
well-known companies in the US oil and gas industry are moving rapidly
to fill the void.

Analysts say this next phase of consolidation is being driven by falling
natural gas reserves in the US and a recognition that when it comes to
securing new resources, size counts.

Recent deals, involving companies such as Conoco and Devon Energy, have
seen US groups buying into Canadian companies, gaining access to the
relatively unexplored fields north of the US's lower 48 states.

Canada's frontier regions are believed to contain some of North
America's largest remaining undeveloped oil and gas deposits. "We are
desperately short of natural gas in North America during the next
five-year period," says Archie Dunham, Conoco's chief executive officer.

"In the history of our industry, we have drilled 3.5m oil and natural
gas wells in the world - 3m of these were drilled in the lower 48
states. The US is a very mature province."

In July, Conoco completed its Dollars 6.3bn acquisition of Gulf Canada
Resources in the largest oil and gas deal in Canadian history -
immediately increasing its North American natural gas production and
proved natural gas reserves by 50 per cent, and worldwide total reserves
(of oil, natural gas and Syncrude) by 40 per cent.

Since then there have been a series of deals, including Devon Energy's
agreement to acquire Calgary-based Anderson Exploration for Dollars
3.4bn to become North America's biggest independent producer of natural
gas.

Devon has more than doubled its size through acquisitions in recent
years. The Anderson acquisition was the second big deal for Devon in a
matter of weeks, following the acquisition of Mitchell Energy and
Development for Dollars 3.1bn.

"Canada is much less explored than the US," says J Larry Nichols,
Devon's chairman, president and chief executive officer. That is, in
turn, setting the stage for a variety of deals in other parts of the
industry.

On September 20, for example, Irving Oil and Chevron Canada Resources
announced plans to construct a Dollars 350m terminal in Canada to unload
natural gas in a liquid form and then convert it to a gaseous state for
use in the region.

The same day, Duke Energy, the third-biggest US electricity utility,
agreed to buy Canada's Westcoast Energy in an Dollars 8.5bn deal to
expand its natural gas pipeline network.

Edward Weatherly, petroleum group terminals manager at
Industrialinfo.com, which analyses the industry, says there is a growing
demand for natural gas caused by regional growth, gas-fired electrical
generation and a gradual shift to natural gas as the fuel of choice.

Gas prices have fallen from highs last winter, but analysts say they are
still 50-70 per cent higher than three years ago, and compa nies know
growth in gas demand will only increase.

However, the amount of money needed to explore and develop new sources
is increasingly significant. "So it gets to be a business of scale and
scope," says Gerald Keenan, an energy strategy partner at PwC. "The
prices in the market make it cheaper to buy reserves on the stock market
than to go look for them."

He and other analysts expect the deals to continue until there is a
solid core of about 10 companies in the second tier of the oil and gas
industry. "The raw economic realities of being in the energy business
require fewer, larger entities," says Curt Launer, of Credit Suisse
First Boston.

That was also what drove the top tier to unite and create global
"super-majors", such as ExxonMobil, the biggest US-based company.

Stedman Garber Jr, chief executive officer of Santa Fe International,
cited the creation of ExxonMobil and ChevronTexaco as the reason for the
Texas drilling company's September 3 decision to merge with Global
Marine to form the world's second biggest offshore drilling contractor.

"All our major customers are merging or have merged, so they're
increasingly looking for one company to serve them worldwide in all of
the major markets."

As the consolidation continues, so will the search for new resources. US
companies are keen to move as aggressively into Alaska as they have been
into Canada. But concerns about destroying the environment have
restricted their movements. The terrorist attacks on the US this month
might, however, mark a turning point.

They might lead to widespread public support for measures to reduce US
dependence on foreign energy sources. Legislation to open the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge to drilling was recently approved by the House
of Representatives, but - before the attacks - analysts had suspected it
would get no further, citing resistance in the Senate.

Now, Michael Mayer, analyst at Prudential Securities Research, says
there is likely to be less partisanship about the issue amid increased
awareness of the need to heighten the nation's energy infrastructure and
develop more domestic sources of oil and natural gas. "This probably
increases the chance of opening a small portion of Alaska," he says.

"The fact is that we are short of natural gas," says Conoco's Mr Dunham.
The US can choose to open Alaska further, he says, or rely increasingly
on imports

Full article at:
http://globalarchive.ft.com/globalarchive/articles.html?print=true&id=01
0928001213

Michael Keaney
Mercuria Business School
Martinlaaksontie 36
01620 Vantaa
Finland

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to