heck, I know places where it's an _honor_ to have the RRPE reject one's publications. -- J. Devine
-----Original Message----- From: John Ernst To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2/16/02 10:25 PM Subject: [PEN-L:22924] Suppression Eric Nilsson [PEN-L:22916] challenges Andrew Kliman to produce evidence of suppression at the hands of URPE/RRPE. Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary, 2nd edition, gives the following definition of "suppress": "3. to prevent or prohibit the publication of ...." So Nilsson is demanding proof of the obvious. Nilsson: "Andrew Kliman has absolutely no evidence that URPE/RRPE has suppressed him." URPE/RRPE: "the Editorial Board has removed the sanction denying Dr. Kliman the right to submit articles to RRPE for publication." Nilsson: "Andrew Kliman has merely asserted that he was won a victory over suppression. But what is the evidence that he ever faced such suppression?" URPE/RRPE: "the Editorial Board has removed the sanction denying Dr. Kliman the right to submit articles to RRPE for publication." Nilsson: "Andrew Kliman has absolutely NO evidence that he has ever faced suppression by RRPE. If he does he should SHOW US THE EVIDENCE." URPE/RRPE: "the Editorial Board has removed the sanction denying Dr. Kliman the right to submit articles to RRPE for publication." Nilsson: "Where is this evidence Andrew? Where's the beef?" URPE/RRPE: "the Editorial Board has removed the sanction denying Dr. Kliman the right to submit articles to RRPE for publication." Nilsson: "It is dishonest to claim you have evidence for such a claim when you have absolutely no evidence for it." URPE/RRPE: "the Editorial Board has removed the sanction denying Dr. Kliman the right to submit articles to RRPE for publication." Nilsson: "If you can't come up with the evidence everyone will know you are lying." URPE/RRPE: "the Editorial Board has removed the sanction denying Dr. Kliman the right to submit articles to RRPE for publication." John Ernst
