> Socialism is necessary in the sense in which food is > necessary: not as something which will be but as something > that must be if we are to survive. > > It is pure religiosity to claim that socialism _will_ come; > it is close to self-evident that unless it comes we will > plunge ever deeper into the barbarism RL predicted. > > Doug doesn't like quotes, but no one has ever said it better > than Mao: If you don't hit it, it won't fall. > > Carrol
Dear Carrol, Why are you being so picky? Look, we the non-native speakers are not as good as you are in this bloody language, O.K.? To some of us, including myself, there is not much difference between necessity, certainty and the like. By the way, I understand you quite well: Please accept my apologies Chris because of my unnecessarily critical words about your statements regarding strange attractors. In reality, I knew what you meant perfectly. Best, Sabri
