This comes from Marxmail.

Ayse Gul Altinay, who wrote the following, is an cultural
antropologist at Sabanci University. Below is a letter to NY
Times criticizing their coverage of antiwar activity in Turkey. I
had sent another artcile of hers from istanbul.indymedia a while
ago. Quite a smart person she sounds.

Best,
Sabri

----- Forwarded message from Ayse Gul Altinay
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:22:42 +0200
From: Ayse Gul Altinay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Ayse Gul Altinay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your coverage of Turkey
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear Mr. Filkins,

I have been reading your articles on Turkey's position in
relation to Iraq with great surprise and disappointment. I
understand that you are based in Turkey, yet there is little
evidence of that in your articles. Your piece on February 4, for
instance, reads more like the press briefing of an anonymous US
diplomat in Ankara' than an informed understanding of Turkey's
reaction to the current situation. I do not understand journalism
to be a one-sided coverage of government policies and statements.
Unfortunately, your coverage of the current situation in Turkey
has been damaging the credibility of the New York Times --in my
eyes and in the eyes of many people I know.

Particularly troubling is the 'misinformation' you provide
regarding the anti-war sentiments of Turkish citizens. Here are
two quotations from your recent pieces:

"There have been few sizable public demonstrations against war in
Iraq. Many Turks say they would like nothing more than to see
Saddam Hussein ousted from Iraq, and in recent days, a number of
journalists and business leaders warned of lasting damage to the
crucial alliance with America."

"Still, opposition to the war has been mostly muted here. There
have been relatively few public demonstrations, and even fewer
that have drawn sizable crowds. Many Turks say they would like
nothing more than to see Saddam Hussein ousted from Iraq, and in
recent days, there was a growing chorus among Turkish journalists
and business leaders that Turkey was running the risk of
seriously damaging its half-century-old alliance with the United
States."

Unfortunately, you have missed the very significant point that
the 'growing chorus' in Turkey has not been that of mainstream
journalists and certain businessmen, it has been that of
organized as well as individual opposition to the war. The people
you cite in making your claim have remained in the small minority
and have faced serious criticism from all fronts.

Are you aware of or have you reported the recent polls which
suggest that 94% of the population strongly oppose this war?

Have you interviewed ANYONE among this 94%?

Have you reported the fact that there are DAILY protests all
around Turkey coming from all sections of the population? The
massive protests in Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir, Mersin? The Assembly
of the 100s last week where more than 2000 people, among them
Turkey's most prominent names (academics, writers, artists,
actors-actresses, businesspeople, doctors, lawyers), made
a joint peace declaration?

Have you been reading the numerous press statements issued by the
Turkish Barr Association, Doctors Association, Academic
associations, human rights organizations, labour unions, the
Anti-War Platform of 162 NGOs, the Peace Initiative of Turkey,
etc.? Have you reported the four-day visit of your fellow citizen
Ryan Amundson who lost a brother in the Sept 11 attacks and
represents 'September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows'
in Turkey? He was on at least 3 national televisions (including
CNN-TURK, NTV, and TV 8, at least one primetime live
interview)and all major newspapers last week. He met with the
Deputy Prime Minister Yalcinbayir and the Speaker of the
Parliament Arinc in Ankara and asked them to oppose the war IN
THE INTERESTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, as well as those of Turkish
and Iraqi people. Have you interviewed him about his views of the
Turkish peace movement and learned about how surprised he was to
see the union of such a diverse group of people from all over the
country being so active together?

Amundson reads the NY Times regularly. One reason why he was
surprised is because none of this has been reported in the
NYTimes (by you or anybody else).

Let me go back to your remark regarding anti-war opposition in
Turkey having been 'mute': Have you, Mr Filkins, asked the
politicians in Ankara how they feel about the thousand messages
they have been getting in their mobile phones in the last three
days? Or the faxes and emails? Have you asked them what they say
to the senders of these messages when they call or write them
back? Have you asked them whether they felt like they were
representing their voters and the citizens of Turkey as they
voted for the modernization of Turkish airports for US use today?
Have you asked them about the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of anti-war
signatures that were presented to them in the last couple of
weeks? Have you interviewed the telephone operators of the
Turkish Grand National Assembly who are overwhelmed with the
protest messages they receive via the phone every day? Most
importantly, have you asked ANYONE if they have seen such
grassroots political activism coming from all sectors of Turkey's
diverse population since the military coup in 1980?

You are right about one thing, Mr. Filkins. The majority of the
Turkish people could not care less about Saddam, if anything they
know what a cruel dictator he was. They are well aware of the
biological weapons he used only 10 years ago (which had met no
opposition from the US at that time). Yet, they are STILL
overwhelmingly against this war because they know that war is not
the answer to this problem, that war will only trigger the use of
the weapons he is believed to have, that the hundreds of
thousands of deaths that this war will incur provide a more
imminent threat to peace and security in the region than Saddam's
regime who has begun to collaborate with the UN. --This is my
interpretation, perhaps you have a better one. But you ARE
obligated to provide an explanation as to the fact that 94% of
the population in Turkey oppose this war WHILE AT THE SAME TIME
opposing Saddam and his cruel regime.

You are also obligated, I believe, to present an OBJECTIVE
account of Turkey's response (both the government AND the people)
to the current situation whether this picture suits US
government's interests or not. Otherwise, we will all conclude
that the New York Times is nothing but an official news agency of
the US government.

For your information, I am attaching to this message a summary of
last week's peace events (only a selection of them over the
weekend of 25-27 January), the Peace Declaration of "the Assembly
of the 100s", and the letter that I sent individually to 550
parliamentarians in Ankara. Mine was among the thousands of such
letters.


Regards,

Ayse Gul Altinay
Assistant Professor of Cultural Anthropology
Sabanci University
Istanbul - Turkey

Reply via email to