Quoting Anthony D'Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

"I share some of Marty's concerns and Doug is right that small 
countries in an era of integration can't do much.  But when speaking of 
China how much growth and development is export-led?"

My reply: As for China�s export dependence, according to the World 
Bank, before 1978, China�s foreign trade was negligible, but, since 
then, the ratio of trade to GDP has quadrupled�from a mere 8.5 percent 
in 1978 to 36.5 percent in 1999.  That is a pretty significant gain for 
export activity.

Moreover, that activity is becoming more central to China�s growth.  
According to Stephen Roach, chief economist at Morgan Stanley, exports 
now account for 74 percent of the growth in the Chinese economy in 
2002.  Thus domestic demand accounts for only 26 percent of the 
growth.  And much of this demand has been driven by state 
infrastructure investment and foreign direct investment.

And the share of foreign companies in exports has grown rapidly, from 
less then 2 percent of total Chinese exports in 1986 to 48 percent in 
2000; their imports rose from less than 6 percent to almost 52 
percent.  

As for some of the consequences of this rise in Chinese export 
orientation, according to the Bank of International Settlements:

�China is already a major producer of labour-intensive manufactures. 
Moreover, as a result of its accession to the WTO, it is expected to 
capture a large share of the liberalised global market in textiles and 
apparel when the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing expires in 
2005. China thus poses major challenges for current producers of 
textiles and other labour intensive manufactures in Southeast Asia. In 
addition, the country has moved steadily up the value added chain, and 
its exports of machinery and high-tech products have increased rapidly. 
China�s share in Asia�s total electronics exports has more than doubled 
during the past five years to 30% in 2002. In contrast, the shares of 
Malaysia and Singapore have fallen off sharply. Anecdotal accounts also 
suggest that production facilities in high-tech sectors are being 
relocated to China from emerging East Asia as well as Japan.� 

Looking at more high end electronics exports, a report by the Japan 
Electronic and Information Technology Industries Association notes that 
China will be the largest electronics exporter in the world in 2003 
with the highest market share in 8 out of 12 major export items.  These 
include mobile phones, color TV sets, laptop computers, desktop PCs, 
PDAs, DVD players, DVD drives, and car stereos.  This represents a 
steady climb for china reflecting its growing importance as a platform 
for advanced transnational corporations.  Thus it was number one in 
only two categories in 2000, three in 2001, five in 2002, and expected 
8 in 2003. 

This rise comes at the expense of other countries, representing a shift 
in production.  Korea did not have a single number one.  And in four 
items, Korea suffered a decline in market share: color TVs, DVD 
players, VTRs, and car stereos.  Among four items not dominated by 
China, Japan is expected to lead in digital cameras, and car 
navigators, Indonesia in VTRs, and Singapore in HDDs, respectively.  
However, according to the report, China is likely to catch up with 
Indonesia and Singapore within two years as production of VTRs and HDDs 
is showing rapid growth.  Japan had the highest rank in four items 
until as late as 2000.  This year China is expected to overtake Japan 
in DVDs and DVD drives. 

Looking just at Japan, according to the Far Eastern Economic Review:

�In the last decade, Japanese investment in China has doubled, to the 
point where more than half of China-Japan trade is conducted among 
Japanese companies.  At the same time, Japan�s trade with China, 
including Hong Kong, more than tripled, to $115 billion last year...

China is luring away billions of dollars� worth of Japanese investment, 
the argument goes, contributing to a 20 percent drop in Japanese 
factory employment during the 1990s.  The Japanese, justifiably or not, 
feel helpless against Chinese wage rates that are 5 percent of Japanese 
levels.   

Adding to Japan�s despair, China is quickly moving past bicycles and 
basic TV sets into the same high-technology, high-value products where 
Japan has long staked its claims.  This year, for the first time, 
machinery displaced textiles as the leading sector of Chinese products 
imported by Japan.�

As for some of the ASEAN countries, China�s rise is far more 
threatening.  For one thing these countries tend to produce products 
similar to ones produced by China. And they are more dependent on FDI 
to sustain that production.  So, as China develops its industries 
thanks to FDI, it becomes harder to imagine continuing economic 
progress in these countries. 

In terms of export similarity, according to the World Bank, �The 
correlation of exports, even at the five-digit (SITC) level between 
China and middle-income countries such as Indonesia and Thailand is 
significant and has been increasing.�

The World Bank highlights the dangerous situation as follows: �The risk 
to exports to third-country markets is confirmed by a market-by-market 
and product-by-product analysis for sample countries. For this analysis 
we identify �exports at risk� to the U.S. and Japan markets based on 
their importance to the exporting country and the extent to which they 
compete with similar products from China.  Exports in product 
categories that are characterized by both a high share of Chinese 
imports (at least 5 percent) and unit values close to those of 
competing imports from China are deemed to be most at risk. For 
Thailand and Indonesia, the results show that 15-25 percent of exports 
to the United States and Japan are at risk from growing competition 
from China.� 

So, in short, China is now attracting more FDI then any other country 
in the world.  Companies from Japan, the U.S., South Korea, etc. are 
all establishing production bases in China to better low costs and 
compete in global trade.  This is coming at the expense of production 
in other countries, including third world countries.  The result is 
that the governments in these countries desperate to hold on to 
investment and production are engaged in actions designed to intensify 
work and lower wages to the detriment of their workers.

More globally, we have a new level of the same problem that helped to 
generate the 1997-98 economic crisis.  A regional export process that 
is aimed at exporting outside the region.  China runs a major surplus 
with the U.S. and deficits with other regions, especially East Asia.  
So the focus of the export activity is on the U.S. and other countries 
are finding their production integrated into a structure that includes 
more and more production located in China.  The process is not positive 
for workers in any of the countries in the region as they are 
increasingly been drawn into direct competition to offer the most 
attractive conditions for TNCs. 

Marty Hart-Landsberg
 

Reply via email to