----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Henwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Cancun


> Eubulides wrote:
>
> >Because food is a matter of national security in this cruel world?
> >For instance, a nation that is totally or even largely dependent upon
> >imported food or imported inputs (e.g., fuels, fertilizers,
> >pesticides, etc.) for food production and distribution is vulnerable
> >to foreign powers' use of economic warfare (like trade embargoes) on
> >it.
> >--
> >Yoshie
> >
> >=====================
> >
> >Precisely the argument the citizens of Norway use to defend subsidies
> >after they were nearly starved to death by the Nazis.
>
> All that homegrown food would rot in the face of an oil embargo.
>
> Doug

===================

They've got a 400 year supply of oil handy.
http://amsterdam.park.org/Guests/Stavanger/sg08.htm

I'm not attempting to justify the subsidies but we do need to look at the
[cultural] path dependency issues rather than assume all uses of subsidies
are inefficient a la economism.

Ian

Reply via email to