This would probably be the appropriate moment -- in light of your comments and Joel Wendland's -- to ask Louis to elaborate on the following statement: "...I am far more interested in defining the class criterion that would make support for bourgeois parties impermissible..."
What are the "class criterion" you have in mind, Louis? Marv G ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Henwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:14 PM Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Historical accuracy > Could someone explain what Ralph Nader's candidacy has to do with the > development of a socialist party in the U.S.? I could swear he was a > petit bourgeois who believed in the beauties of small business and > competition. > > Doug >
