Jonathan Lassen wrote:

When these kind of news stories - see below - appear (and we're only
hearing about this one because one of  the villagers was able to get to the
internet), perhaps we should pause and look a bit closer at what's going
on. The way that these Contradictions
are either displaced, resolved, or sublated will have, IMO, a wide-reaching
influence on how the 21st Century plays out, just as  they did last
century.

Jonathan

-----------------
 Villagers vow to fight on in face of police assault
�Joint owners want to overturn the sale of 150 hectares worth 40 million
yuan
 SCMP | 3 aug

Villagers in Henan province vowed to continue their fight for justice
after police intervened at the weekend to quell their protest over land
sales, leaving several people injured and four detained.


Is this particular story emblematic of the restoration of capitalism, though? Isn't it true that this kind of event took place in pre-reform China -- and not necessarily to benefit the working and toiling classes? We expect to see it in capitalist countries, of course. In a socialist country, however, where the working class is the dominant social strata, one might expect it not to happen.

My question is, to what extent is political repression in China the result
of a one-party system that had/s(?) the tendency to disallow dissenting
opinions and/or the insistence on a single path to socialism (if that kind
of rhetoric is allowable), or a political culture (not meant in the
anthropological sense) generated by a cultural-revolution-type atmosphere
rather than a "restoration of capitalism"? I think some parallels are easily
made with the Soviet Union and the "means to an end" mentality of some on
the left in that one-party system, considering that it doesn't exist
anymore.

Joel Wendland
http://www.politicalaffairs.net

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee�
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

Reply via email to