Gene Coyle wrote:
> Max,
> I was thinking of their solid marriage to neo-classical economics -- just
> tweaking it with a little behavioral adjustments.  The following quote is
> what scares me -- what put the kibosh on the Notre Dame econ department, to
> all of our loss:
>
>> Like their intellectual godfather Thaler, the Obama wonks aren't
>> particularly interested in tearing down existing paradigms, just adjusting
>> and extending them when they become outdated. (Thaler urges his students to
>> master the same traditional, mathematical models their colleagues do if they
>> want to be taken seriously.)

> It is true that to be "taken seriously"  you need to demonstrate that you
> won't think much about the theory, but when is CHANGE going to happen?

FWIW, it's a fact of academic life that if you don't know the
traditional (mathematical) theory, you won't get respect in most
economics departments. But experimental methods are getting more
respect (e.g., my department, which almost specializes in the stuff).

Also, it turns out that a lot mathematical economic theory indicates
that traditional neoclassical theories are bogus: for example, there's
no reason in neoclassical why any single "free market" reform will
improve economic welfare as defined in neoclassical terms. (This is
the theory of the second best.)

Of course, that is just a tempest in the academic teapot. CHANGE will
come when there's a mass movement outside of and inside of academia
calling for it. Back in the 1930s, the mass discontent with the
economy's state pushed the economics profession to embrace Keynesian
economics. (When things settled down, Keynesian economics was
effectively neutered.) Back in the 1960s and early 1970s, the anti-war
movement spawned URPE and actually forced the mainstream mavens to pay
attention for awhile. I wouldn't expect CHANGE to ever come from
inside the economics profession.
-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to