I am nearly finished reading Rick Kuhn's biography of the Polish economist and have found the chapter on his crisis theory quite interesting in terms of its explanation of over-accumulation, the organic composition of capital, falling rate of profit, etc. However, while reading it, I wondered how relevant Grossman (or other Marxists focused on the organic composition of capital) is to the current crisis, which does not involve an increasing organic composition of capital. It, like most crises since the 1950s, involve "fictitious capital" to one extent or another, from the savings and loan crisis to LTCM--and now the credit crisis on Wall Street. Speculative bubbles such as these hardly relate to increased automation of auto, etc., or any other typical manifestation of the organic composition of capital. In fact, heavy industry--the sector addressed by classical Marxism such as Daniel Guerin's "Fascism and Big Business"--seems to play a minor role in economic upheavals in the advanced capitalist countries. The dot-com crisis was ostensibly non-financial, but the fact that it arose out of a disconnect with "bricks and mortars" makes it seem another exception to Grossman (and Mattick's) formulas.

Any thoughts?
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to