What a surprise... not...
The Democrats have been so good at snatching defeat from the jaws of
victory... Let's see if they can make it a hat trick, eh?
The sad thing is that most Democrats seem to be just yawning and waking up to
the fact that their party is inherently undemocratic, and they're scratching
their heads wondering why this mishegas is unfurling.
Imagine: the first election in-- what?-- 40 years where the party's
nomination will not be a coronation, but will just be plain rigged.
adx
ravi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
====================
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/22/exit.polls/index.html
[...]
But the contest appears to have left a bad taste in the mouth of many
voters: Eleven percent of those voting in the Democratic race said
they would vote for McCain over Clinton. Another 6 percent said they
would stay home in a race between McCain and Clinton, the New York
senator and former first lady.
Ten percent of Democrats said they would sit on their hands in a
McCain-Obama race, and 15 percent said they would vote for McCain over
the Illinois senator.
[...]
====================
Well, what do you know, this time around the Democrats have two
spoiler candidates and they can't even blame it on Nader ;-).
--ravi
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now._______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
