On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Shane Mage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Only from someone just "selling cacao beans short."  Both trades will have
> to be unwound within the speculators' short time horizon.  One side, in a
> very volatile market, will make big profits, the other side will suffer
> somewhat bigger losses, the difference going to intermediaries.  But whether
> the price soars or plummets, it can only stay there if the supply or demand
> side fundamentals justify it.  It is "fundamentals" that speculators
> speculate about, to the extent that they aren't merely speculating about
> other speculators' speculative intentions.

I sent this link to PEN-L earlier: some people are arguing very
persuasively that a new breed of speculator (pension funds) is
responsible for the commodities bubble. This money is trying to enter
a new asset class and is therefore long-only and is completely
price-insensitive. As long as more dumb money keeps pouring into these
asset classes, the bubble will continue.

http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/052008Masters.pdf

>From the Senate Testimony of hedge fund manager Michael W. Masters
-----------------------------------snip
Commodities prices have increased more in the aggregate over the last
five years than at any other time in U.S. history.1 We have seen
commodity price spikes occur in the past as a result of supply crises,
such as during the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo. But today, unlike previous
episodes, supply is ample: there are no lines at the gas pump and
there is plenty of food on the shelves.

If supply is adequate - as has been shown by others who have testified
before this committee2 - and prices are still rising, then demand must
be increasing. But how do you explain a continuing increase in demand
when commodity prices have doubled or tripled in the last 5 years?

What we are experiencing is a demand shock coming from a new category
of participant in the commodities futures markets: Institutional
Investors. Specifically, these are Corporate and Government Pension
Funds, Sovereign Wealth Funds, University Endowments and other
Institutional Investors. Collectively, these investors now account on
average for a larger share of outstanding commodities futures
contracts than any other market participant.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to