current version below. ------ please send signatures to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with subject line: sign economists letter. please include affiliation consistent with the idea of "economists' letter."
deadline: end of day Friday August 15. Robert Naiman Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ Economists' Letter on Offshore Drilling [date] Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell House Speaker Nancy Pelosi House Minority Leader John Boehner Dear Senators Reid and McConnell and Representatives Pelosi and Boehner, As economists, we write out of concern that you are being pressured to lift the Congressional ban on most oil drilling off our coasts, despite the fact that this would do nothing in the short term and almost nothing in the long term to reduce gas prices. Simpler measures that don't threaten our environment would do much more. The federal government's Energy Information Administration projects that this would have no impact on gas prices in the near-term since it will be close to a decade before the first oil could be extracted. The EIA projects production would reach 200,000 barrels a day at peak production. It describes this amount as too small to have any significant effect on oil prices, even when production is at its peak. [1] If the US had raised auto fuel efficiency standards between 1985-2005 by a quarter of the amount it raised them annually from 1980-1985, instead of leaving them virtually unchanged, the result would roughly have been the equivalent of 3.3 million barrels of oil per day in new production,16 times the projected impact of offshore drilling. [2] It is reasonable to assume that modest increases in fuel efficiency in the future would have a similar effect. If we negotiated an agreement with Iran that led to the lifting of US sanctions, oil production in Iran could increase 1-2 million barrels a day. That would be 5-10 times the projected impact of drilling off our coasts. U.S. oil companies are not doing all they can do boost production. In May, the Washington Post reported that Exxon had spent $8 billion buying back shares in the first quarter as a way to boost the value of the stock for shareholders. That far exceeded the company's $5.5 billion capital spending budget.[3] In 2006, Exxon spent $25 billion buying back its stock, again more than its capital spending budget. [4] The industry spent $52.4 billion on stock buybacks in 2006, nearly double the amount in 2005. [5] It would be far better to pursue modest conservation and negotiations with Iran, having the effect of bringing 20-25 times as much oil on the market, rather than endanger tourism, fishing, and beaches on our coasts for a long-term effect on gas prices that we won't even notice. Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. James K. Galbraith, Lloyd M. Bentsen, Jr. Chair in Government/Business Relations, LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin Barbara R. Bergmann, Professor Emerita of Economics, University of Maryland and American University Dean Baker, Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington Mark Weisbrot, Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington Lucy Law Webster, Board Secretary, Economists for Peace and Security Michael Perelman, Professor of Economics, California State University, Chico James Devine, Professor of Economics, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles Hadi Salehi Esfahani, Editor-in-Chief, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance; President, Middle East Economics Association; Professor of Economics; Director of Global Studies Initiative, University of Illinois, Urbana Edward S. Herman, Finance Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Rudy Fichtenbaum, Professor of Economics, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio Michael Brun, Professor of Economics, Illinois State University, Bloomington-Normal Jeffrey Stewart, Professor of Economics, University of Cincinnati Laurence Shute, Professor Emeritus of Economics, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Hendrik Van den Berg, Professor of Economics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Lyle Fettig, Professor Emeritus, Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana Hank Leland, Research Analyst, SEIU, Washington References: [1] "Annual Energy Outlook 2007 with Projections to 2030," Energy Information Administration, February 2007, http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo07/issues.html [2] " Offshore Drilling and Energy Conservation: The Relative Impact on Gas Prices," Dean Baker and Nichole Szembrot, Center for Economic and Policy Research, June 2008, http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/offshore_drilling_2008_06.pdf [3] "Up $10.9 Billion, Exxon Worries About New Tax," Steven Mufson, Washington Post, May 2 2008. [4] "Higher Oil Prices Help Exxon Again Set Record Profit, " Steven Mufson, Washington Post, February 2, 2007. [5] "Big Companies Put Record Sums Into Buybacks," Ian McDonald,. Wall Street Journal, June 12, 2006. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
