Jim: > BTW, it's better to respond to what people say rather > than to what you "expect" them to say.
You are proving once again that you do not do econometrics for the past 30 years. You are supposed to say such things if you are in this business. What do you think I will say two days from now when I duscuss a paper the European Finance Association conference here in Athina: You need causality tests, find Intrumental Variables, build a structural model, employ the Heckman dummy endogenous frame work and all that. >> But, suppose that you did everything there is to do and >> reached to the conclusion that yeah, both parties were >> responding to each other and more. >> >> Then what happens? > I don't understand this. what "parties" are you referring > to? What do you mean you don't understand? Of course, following Micheal, I am referring to sex. What is the direction of causality: Do I as a man respond to the demands of the women or do women respond to what I supply? What am I supposed to do with all these demands of these women? Best, Sabri _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
