I don't want a post-Keynesian party. However, I do think it's good to know what people in the financial establishment are thinking about (even though I know they're working against the working majority).
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Sabri Oncu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim: > >> Rather, if he is one, he's a liberal apologist, calling for increased >> government >> regulation of finance as if it were the Solution. > > Yes, Lowenstein is a liberal apologist! Minsky calls for increased > government regulation too, but he recognizes that Capitalism is a > flawed system, which is inherently unstable. Lowenstein does not! On > the other hand, I see nothing wrong with calling for increased > government regulation, another New Deal of some sort maybe, which > would be revolutionary for the US at the current time. > > But I don't have much hope of even that. > > You see, you are not thinking about starting even a Post-Keynesian Party! > > Why should I have any hope? > > Sabri > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
