Ted Winslow writes:

"Keynes' analysis is based on ontological and anthropological foundations 
different from Austrian foundations.  As he himself points out in the case of 
Hayek, this goes unnoticed by Austrian readers of Keynes."

Well, since Keynes pointed out the issue over 60 years ago, is it your position 
that every Austrian who subsequently read Keynes also failed to notice the 
different ontological and anthropological foundations?

David Shemano
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to