Here's an issue forgotten on pen-l (though likely not by its
participants). From SLATE's summary of major US newspapers:
>Many who were celebrating an Obama victory yesterday suddenly felt the moment 
>wasn't as sweet as it could have been when they checked the news and 
>discovered that California's Proposition 8 was approved. The LA [TIMES] 
>devotes a front-page piece to the measure, which will write a prohibition of 
>same-sex marriages into California's Constitution, and says its proponents 
>managed to win backers by running an effective campaign that warned that 
>children would be taught about gay marriage in schools. The surge in black 
>voters played a significant role in this outcome as they made up 10 percent of 
>the voters and sided with the measure by margins of more than 2-to-1. Latino 
>voters also favored the measure by a small margin. Three lawsuits have been 
>filed asking the California Supreme Court to overturn the measure. The NYT 
>fronts a piece looking at how voters in Florida and Arizona also approved 
>measures prohibiting marriage between two people of the same sex.

> In the LAT's op-ed page, John Corvino writes that no one should see 
> Proposition 8 as more than a temporary delay in the advancement of gay 
> rights. "The path to inclusion is not always direct and the pace of change 
> almost never steady," writes Corvino. "This setback is by no means a final 
> verdict."<
-- 
Jim Devine /  "Nobody told me there'd be days like these / Strange
days indeed -- most peculiar, mama." -- JL.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to