Louis Proyect wrote: > There are 2 ways at looking at the > question of TINA (There is no > alternative.) First, you can accept > the objective conditions and not go > off on an ultraleft binge like the > sectarian "Marxist-Leninist" groups > for whom it is always 1917. We > don't want to go there. Secondly, > you can persist--no matter how > unpopular it is--to point out that > Obama is basically a Rockefeller > Republican, just like Clinton and > Carter. I advocate that stance.
Thoughtful and gutsy! It takes big cojones to take that stance in these listservs. But, is that all? Avoiding sectarian "Marxism-Leninism" and denouncing Obama as a Rockefeller Republican is what's required to advance Marxist (TM) socialism in the U.S.? _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
