Please don't use personal attacks here.

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:04:25PM -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
> Let's see, in the past 8 years, we have had tax reductions, two wars, and 
> huge increasing budget deficits.  Who among you is going to say with a 
> straight face we have not had a huge fiscal stimulus?  The stimulus worked 
> great for 6 and 1/2 years until we all realized the stimulus had gone into 
> building homes for people who can't afford them.  So as we deal with the 
> hangover of the last stimulus and stumble toward rationality, Nobel winner 
> Paul Krugman is arguing that the solution to our difficulties is a bigger 
> fiscal stimulus?  The problem with Bushonomics was that we did not have 
> enough tax reductions,  wars and budget deficits?  You all realize this is 
> insane, don't you?
> >
> > David Shemano
>
> ---
>
> Shamano, your email software is all fucked up. When I hit reply, the right 
> margin went off into the stratosphere. Ordinarily, I don't reply to 
> malformed messages, but I did think it was worth answering your libertarian 
> nonsense so I reformatted it above.
>
> To get straight to the point (and I might even work this into a book on 
> FDR), the American economy was in an expansionary phase up until the 1970s 
> even if it was faced by temporary dislocations like the Great Depression.
>
> Auto, steel, armaments, etc. were all growth industries. Today there is 
> nothing that has replaced them. There has been a desperate search since the 
> 1970s to inflate (not in a fiscal sense) the American economy but nothing 
> has been able to provide the kind of job growth that the smokestack 
> industries once did except for high technology but that has evaporated as 
> well.
>
> That is the main reason there have been bubbles after bubbles in recent 
> decades. Capitalism might have experienced a greater shock in 1929 than it 
> has today in terms of GDP reduction, unemployment, etc. but it faces much 
> worse long-term prospects today. That is a contradiction that even many 
> Marxists have failed to grasp.
>
> Libertarian panglosses like yourself of course are living in your own 
> bubble, so I assume that this will be lost on you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> pen-l@lists.csuchico.edu
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
pen-l@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to