Doug wrote: > Supporting the Labor Party is always a possibility. As is working on > specific issues. If they spent $100 million and sent a few scores of > thousands of people around knocking on doors and making phone calls > for single payer, the political landscape would change dramatically. > The executive branch is the ruling class's branch, and that's not > going to change any time soon.
They still see a big difference between having a Reagan or a Clinton in the executive branch. I can't fault them for that. So, it's not clear to me that it's money stupidly spent. But I agree with your broader point of spreading bets, going local and topical (specific issues). Building up from there. But at the national level, which is what I was pondering, the choices are narrower. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
