Julio Huato wrote: >> They still see a big difference between having a Reagan or a Clinton in the >> executive branch.<
Doug: > Yeah, they do, but I'm not sure why. > > Annual rate of decline in union density by presidential term: > > Reagan -3.3% > Clinton -2.1% > Bush -1.6% is that Bush II? could it be that union density has hit close to rock bottom, so that even the most anti-union President has a hard time lowering it further? there is a clear difference between the GOP and the DP from the perspective of labor's leaders. But they somehow have to act "hard to get" (and have something worth getting) if they want any help from the DP. -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
