Louis Proyect wrote:
> ... Here you have Bush and the Dems
> supporting aid for the big 3 auto companies, but it does not pass because
> why? Because the Republicans would have filibustered? So the Dems need 60
> votes to push through "progressive" legislation?

something similar happened with immigration "reform." Bush & the DP
were allied, but then were blocked by the GOP congresscritters.

> By this calculation, they
> can always use the excuse of a Republican filibuster to "go back to the
> drawing board" and come up with a proposal that is acceptable to everyone. A
> sure-fire formula for screwing working people, if you ask me.

Maybe. It's also possible that sometimes the "committee for managing
the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie" can't get it together to
decide what's the best thing to do. Particular interests sometimes win
over the class interest, especially since the latter is often hard to
pin down.

-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to