raghu wrote:
> re: "class trumps race". Yes it  certainly does. In the theoretical
> world of Marxists.

<<  Class doesn't "trump" race for all types of self-identified Marxists.
There  are a lot of "third worldists." (I don't think it's worth
arguing about  who's a "true" Marxist and who isn't.) >> 


Comment
 
It is a good thing that a new generation, my children (son  35, daughters 30 
and 26) have a different sensibility and did not grow up in  the Jim Crow 
cage. Discrimination based on color has not vanished from America  and feelings 
(emotions), ideas and behavior rooted in Southern slave  relations (blacks as 
slaves and whites as non-slaves and masters) and Mr.  Crow, still persists 
amongst an increasingly tiny part of a dying population  (colonialism).The 
younger 
generation is not going to swallow concepts and  ideas that run counter to how 
they understand their real life activity and  material relations. 
 
The color factor in world history, and then the slow  emergence of white 
supremacy as a material power, predates the formation and  consolidation of the 
capitalist mode of production; is rooted in a slavery  that formed the pivot 
for 
capital accumulation (the primitive accumulation of  capital); which gave 
impetus to navigation, weapons development, the expansion  of science or the 
slow 
incremental transition from light and simple  manufacture (made by hand) to 
heavy manufacture as (in mass ship building,  steels works, mass production of 
nails, etc.,); and finally develops as a  rationale for the genocidal clearing 
of Indians from America. 
 
What is color discrimination a rationale for today? Or have  we sufficiently 
distant ourselves from an old economic/ideological relations  and Jim Crow to 
look at things different than as in say the 1960's?  The moment one strips the 
old concept of race from their  intellectual index, a different complex of 
shapes and events becomes visible.  The idea that "Europeans" are a race, whose 
distinctive color, eye,  skin color and hair texture, is proof of their race, 
is down right  ridiculous.  
 
Who invented the concept that class trumps differences  of characteristic of 
a biological root within Marxism and American  Marxism?  If the statement, 
"class trumps race" is not taken at face  value but examined, another question 
arises; "what is class abstractly" and as  a real material relations in America 
and why is class important in the here  and now? Or for the past 80 or 150 
years. What is the validity of class if one  never speaks of the actual 
relations 
and intersection of class as a material  force in the life of our country? 
Lastly, how does the American people  understand class as behavior. Americans 
have never witnessed - behaved, as if  there is basically two great classes in 
America outlined in Marx Communists  Manifesto. 
 
I understand class in the general Marx sense of its meaning,  but find it's 
more intellectual challenging to unravel the flowing and  changing way in which 
the American people, and especially our working class  understand and acts 
out it "classness." Obama has energized not just me but  millions as these 
millions energized his campaign and made fun, for me to once  again shift 
through 
American history and openly speak of the Third American  Revolution: The 
Proletarian Revolution. These are exciting - but  dangerous times. 
 
Class trumps race seems to be a slogan rather than an  attempt to come to 
grips with why the voting sections of our working  class entered into a complex 
unity of class and merging of identity with  various layers within classes, 
repudiating the last 8 years of capital rule as  Bush W. And this alignment - 
intersection of class, over ran quantitative  distinctions and real inequality 
voiced as sex, gender, disability or  challenge; skin color and hair texture. 
Obama hit the American working class  like a Mack truck and energized a pool of 
hate from the far left to the far  right.  Rather than material concepts and 
terms like skin color and hair  texture, or the color factor, the terms race is 
re-energized to hide the  obvious. Whites are not a race. 
 
Does class in fact trump, have an intrinsic higher value -  importance, than 
skin color and hair texture or the color factor in  history? The question 
makes no sense. Does class trump have an intrinsic  higher value, than Jim 
Crow,  
or institutional racism or  discrimination? Does class trump the persistence 
of color discrimination?  These question make no-sense because the underlying 
concepts make no sense to  a large mass of people. 
 
One thing is clear to me. The Marxists, like some economists  of the past, 
have a devil of a time ridding themselves of old concepts that  have revealed 
themselves to be inaccurate and useless. If only these Marxists  were as 
revolutionary as our productive capital in the shape of real  commodities, 
which must 
shift and change; complete its cycle of conversion;  continuously reproduce 
itself and expand in the face of real world change  or die a horrible death in 
the market place. Marxist tend to pay no price -  literally, for mistaken 
propositions. 
 
Race. I cannot prove to any one that whites are not a race,  an "evil race," 
if they have already proven to themselves that whites are in  fact a 
biologically ace. Its funny how the extreme left collapses into the  extreme 
right and 
on this basis intersect with the race Marxists. 
 
But then against the concept of class and real American  history are 
virtually never applied and articulated as a living index by  the race 
Marxists. The 
race concept Marxists remind me of Neo in the movie the  Matrix. Even after Neo 
agreed to swallow the Marx pill of freedom and then was  bodily freed from 
bondage by Marxists, he still had to be freed of his Jim  Crow, or rather 
mental 
chains to realize he was "the One." Being "the one" did  not mean he could 
free humanity, but that he had an important role amongst the  other "ones."
 
The race Marxists as a group, remind me of those slaves who  refused to flee 
to the North or the Northern army lines during the Civil War.  Many of these 
slaves were fearless, but refused to flee because they did  not know they were 
slaves. They earnestly thought slave was just another name  like mechanic or 
blacksmith. 
 
U a slave Neo. 
 
WL. 
 



**************From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay 
up-to-date with the latest news. (http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000023)
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to