Charles Brown writes:

>> Does the current hesitancy of Wall Street banks to lend
>> constitute some type of liquidity trap ?

A "liquidity trap" implies, to me, an irrational decision not to borrow and 
lend based upon prevailing interest rates.  After an extended credit bubble, 
the overall market is deleveraging, i.e. reducing indebtedness.  Leveraged 
consumers presently not demanding loans and trying to reduce indebtedness is 
not irrational.  Banks changing credit policies to make loans only to solvent 
borrowers that will be repaid is not irrational.  Insolvent banks holding on to 
cash instead of loaning it out in order to address creditor and depositor 
demands is not irrational.  Businesses projecting slower consumer demand and 
therefore reducing borrowing is not irrational.  There is no liquidity trap -- 
the market is shouting at the top of its lungs it wants to deleverage.  The 
only irrational behavior is that of the politicians trying to stop the 
deleveraging.  All policy that is intended to prevent deleveraging (i.e. 
increase borrrowing) at this time is based upon the theory that the problem !
 with the credit bubble wasn't the existence of the bubble, but that the bubble 
ended.  That is irrational.  

David Shemano
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to