On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Shane Mage <[email protected]> wrote: > Everyone with any sense would disagree that performance of an erotic service > for pay amounts to selling one's body (rather than one's labor power). > But who would disagree with that there are women--and men, and children--who > are forced to sell their labor power to owners of intensely polluting > factories (under conditions worse than those in most any brothel) in order > to survive? So why the extraspecial outrage when that terrible word "sex" > is mentioned?
That's because sex *is* special and not just another form of work. This is so trivially obvious that I am surprised that it is even necessary to point it out. Now I am beginning to understand why Michael doesn't like the subject. -raghu. -- "A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
