On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Doyle Saylor wrote:
Doug,
You've got to be kidding. Facebook status updates consist mostly of inane reports of daily life ("I need coffee!" "I just steamed some sugar snap peas." - actual quotes from my FB friends), or reposts of material produced by professional journalists. The amount of amateur or "community" information production approaches zero.

Doyle;
So you down grade that as trivial. So trivial is not worth anything to you. Community content is actually very important to people, but the ability to use it on a more complex scale with pictures and sound is new enough that we don't know yet how that will move things. Still providing the service is profitable for Facebook.



I have lost Doug's response to this, but I want to quickly comment on this before I hit the road.

Doug hints at the fact that Facebook is in reality not profitable. But I think that is not as crushing a point as it seems. Facebook, IMHO, has tremendous potential to be profitable (as seen in the eagerness of those willing to invest in it, continuously), but again IMHO, they are holding out for the "killer" model, rather than start making money today on more advertising, more user profiling, paid access, etc.

Facebook is not an example of an information source as much as it is a good example of an online community, in fact a better one than these mailing lists prone to flamewars and antisocial style of communication (absent emoticons).

I think Doyle has a point: these technologies, ways of sharing bits, is new and how and where it goes remains to be seen. We live under such a overbearing cloud of experts and expertise that we may forget these things swing both ways: if blogs today borrow their raw data from professional reportage, today's anointed professionals have built their establishment (e.g: medicine) on the basis of appropriating community knowledge.

I am off... more later...

        --ravi


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to