Jim Devine:

right. In addition, we have to be clear that we embrace a positive
definition of freedom, i.e., the freedom to do what we want, rather
than the negative one (freedom from external restraint, usually from
government rules).

^^^^^^^
CB: Yes, this is an important dimension of the materialist concept of
freedom over the bourgeois concept.  Having enough food, shelter,
health care, material necessities enables freedom. We are not against
what you refer to as negative freedom - individual freedom from the
state punishing you for speech, practicing religion or other
thinking/speaking activities or to carry guns , as contained in the
bourgeois US Bill of Rights.  But the US Constitution should also
provide a right to affrimative provision of a job, income, food, etc.
not only freedom from prohibitions (negative freedoms).  It must
provide rights _to_ material requisites to exercise of freedom , not
just freedom _from_ government interference.

Materialist freedom includes the bourgeois or idealist "negative "
freedoms from inteference or prohibition of thought/speaking and adds
to them the positive freedoms of enablement through provision of
material necessities to live without which one cannot think or speak.

^^^^^

of course, this isn't true or absolute freedom, since what we want is
determined by our genes and upbringing, by biology and society.

^^^^
CB: If I follow you here, we as individuals are not born  with the
ability to totally create from scratch our own needs, wants and
desires. We aren't born blank slates that start writing on ourselves.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to