From: raghu
>
>> A welfare state is in the
>> long-term interests of the elites.
>
> It is? What in god's name do you base this on?


Of course it is. A government health plan for e.g., will hurt the
insurance industry, but it will dramatically reduce labor costs for
every other employer, produce a healthier and less stressed workforce
etc all of which have to be good for productivity and profits. Think
of GM - it may have avoided bankruptcy if there was national
health-care.

The same argument applies generally. Up to a point, what is good for a
worker is good for his/her employer.


The dumb capitalist works his employees to death, leaves nothing for
public infrastructure, education, health etc, and pays just enough to
keep workers from starving. A dumb capitalist practices "slash and
burn" production.

The far-sighted capitalist works his employees moderately to maximize
their lifetime productivity, invests on R&D, infrastructure etc to
sustain profitability and pays his employees enough to keep
consumption levels high (but not enough to start accumulating) and his
workforce contented.

Financiers are always dumb capitalists, it is in the nature of
finance. They are also the most destructive. Nothing good ever comes
out of financialization.

A far-sighted capitalist is in a sense an oxymoron. A very, very
far-sighted capitalist would be essentially indistinguishable from a
socialist, because making capitalism sustainable over the long-term
requires restraining all its natural tendencies.

-raghu.


^^^^^^^^^
CB: Many leftists have analyzed the historically concrete "Welfare
State" or social democratic policies or Keynesian policies of the
twentieth century as reforms that "saved" capitalism from socialist
revolution by placating workers in Western countries in the face of
the example of workers' revolution in Russia/SU. If true, this is a
sense in which the welfare state , in its actual historical occurrence
, was in the long term interest of elites. It preserved the capitalist
system for the capitalist elites.

In the "long run or term", it has turned out that the Soviet Union and
the socialist system in Europe collapsed; and the capitalists have
happily set about deconstructing _parts_ of the welfare states.

Most capitalists, notoriously, don't give a shit about the long run or
the whole capitalist system.  They reportedly look only to the next
quarter's profit reports _for their company only_.  It is interesting
how economists , especially big timers like Volecker ,are like the
Capitalist or Bourgeois Party, the vanguard or partisans of the
capitalist class as a whole and in the long run. They look at the big
picture on behalf of the mass of capitalists who are very near
sighted. The economists ( and lawyer buddies, like Mr. Justice Lewis
Powell) are professional anti-revolutionaries.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to