From: Jim Devine <[email protected]>

Someone should mention the content of Cockburn's (and Silverstein's)
critique of the Southern Poverty Law Center. It's that it exaggerates
the prevalence of racism in the South in order to raise funds for its
own leaders. That critique is plausible to me, since my impression is
that Chicago (where I came from) is just as racist as the South in the
era after the Civil Rights Act. Further, though I could be wrong, I
doubt that a significant number of people has been lynched in the
South in recent decades, but the SPLC has sent me pictures of
lynchings. (My mom used to send a lot of money to them -- and a couple
of their books to me.)

^^^^
CB: My Mom gets the SPLC newsletter , too. However, from my glances at
it, it discusses fascistic racist groups in the North too.

Is Alexander Cockburn got some counter data ?  Over my decades in
organizations like Klan-watch and the National Alliance Against Racist
and Political Repression, I haven't really heard much about Cockburn's
participation in our efforts to fight the fascistic right.

Cockburn is a  climate change denialist , too, no ? Oh yeah I remember
now. Several years back Cockburn had a thesis on making left-right
unity with people like the group bombed in Texas.  Remember that ? His
libertarian streak.  This is a continuation of that line.  It's clear
to me , now.

If SPLC  sent you pictures of lynchings, why do you doubt there have
been lynchings ?

Anyway, Cockburn is not a good source on this issue. He's something of
a crackpot on this.

Lou Pro has an essay on him "The political devolution of Alexander Cockburn"

http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/american_left/cockburn.htm

Lou says:

"Cockburn's most infamous article on the militias likened them to the
Zapatistas. He couldn't seem to understand why leftists in the US were
willing to solidarize with Mayan peasants fighting for land reform and
democracy, but held the American militias at arm's length. Any fool
could have explained to Cockburn what the problem was. The American
militias were primarily composed of xenophobes, who not only hated the
federal government but blacks, American Indians and immigrants as
well. Their goal was to return the US to its constitutional roots, a
dubious prospect for all those disenfranchised peoples that the
founding fathers had little use for, including the slaves and the
indigenous peoples. One could only wonder where Cockburn would be
going next with this glorification of rural neopopulism. Would the Ku
Klux Klan be the next group to be eulogized as "misunderstood white
workers"? "

So, Cockburn's denial of increase in KKK-like organizations is part of
his longer term strange thesis on leftists uniting with rightwing US
militias.





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Cockburn
"On March 16, 2009 Cockburn officially became a new columnist for the
paleoconservative Chronicles magazine.[4]."
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to