more interesting to me is the potential split between the pro-Empire
and anti-Empire Tea Partiers. we need more anti-Empire Republicans.


On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Jim Devine <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there any way to exploit the gap between the "social conservatives"
> (anti-abortos, etc.) and the money libertarians within the
> broadly-defined GOP movement?
>
> New York TIMES / March 12, 2010
> Tea Party Avoids Divisive Social Issues
> By KATE ZERNIKE
>
> For decades, faith and family have been at the center of the
> conservative movement. But as the Tea Party infuses conservatism with
> new energy, its leaders deliberately avoid discussion of issues like
> gay marriage or abortion.
>
> God, life and family get little if any mention in statements or
> manifestos. The motto of the Tea Party Patriots, a large coalition of
> groups, is “fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free
> markets.” The Independence Caucus questionnaire, which many Tea Party
> groups use to evaluate candidates, poses 80 questions, most on the
> proper role of government, tax policy and the federal budgeting
> process, and virtually none on social issues.
>
> The Contract From America, which is being created Wiki-style by
> Internet contributors as a manifesto of what “the people” want
> government to do, also mentions little in the way of social issues,
> beyond a declaration that parents should be given choice in how to
> educate their children. By contrast, the document it aims to improve
> upon — the Contract With America, which Republicans used to market
> their successful campaign to win a majority in Congress in 1994 — was
> prefaced with the promise that the party would lead a Congress that
> “respects the values and shares the faith of the American family.”
>
> Tea Party leaders argue that the country can ill afford the discussion
> about social issues when it is passing on enormous debts to future
> generations. But the focus is also strategic: leaders think they can
> attract independent voters if they stay away from divisive issues.
>
> “We should be creating the biggest tent possible around the economic
> conservative issue,” said Ryan Hecker, the organizer behind the
> Contract From America. “I think social issues may matter to particular
> individuals, but at the end of the day, the movement should be
> agnostic about it. This is a movement that rose largely because of the
> Republican Party failing to deliver on being representative of the
> economic conservative ideology. To include social issues would be
> beside the point.”
>
> As the Tea Party pushes to change the Republican Party, the purity
> they demand of candidates may have more to do with economic
> conservatism than social conservatism. Some Tea Party groups, for
> instance, have declined to endorse J. D. Hayworth, who has claimed the
> mantle of a fiscal conservative, in the Republican Senate primary in
> Arizona. But these groups find his record in Congress no more fiscally
> responsible than the man he seeks to oust, John McCain.
>
> The Tea Party defines economic conservatism more strictly than most
> Republicans in Congress would — the Tea Party agrees about the need to
> do away with earmarks, but the Contract, for example, also includes a
> proposal to scrap the tax code and replace it with one no longer than
> 4,543 words (a number chosen to match the length of the Constitution,
> unamended.) It would limit the growth of federal spending to inflation
> plus the percentage of population growth and require a two-thirds
> majority for any tax increase.
>
> <clip>
>
>
> New York TIMES / March 11, 2010
> Outraged by Glenn Beck’s Salvo, Christians Fire Back
> By LAURIE GOODSTEIN
>
> Last week, the conservative broadcaster Glenn Beck called on
> Christians to leave their churches if they hear preaching about social
> or economic justice, saying they were code words for Communism and
> Nazism.
>
> This week the remarks prompted outrage from several Christian
> bloggers. The Rev. Jim Wallis, who leads the liberal Christian
> antipoverty group Sojourners, in Washington, called on Christians to
> leave Glenn Beck.
>
> “What he has said attacks the very heart of our Christian faith, and
> Christians should no longer watch his show,” Mr. Wallis wrote on his
> blog, God’s Politics. “His show should now be in the same category as
> Howard Stern.”
>
> In attacking churches that espouse social justice, Mr. Beck is taking
> on most mainline Protestant, Roman Catholic, black and Hispanic
> congregations in the country — not to mention plenty of evangelical
> churches and even his own, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
> Saints.
>
> <clip>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
> way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to