Sounds like the same thing he is trying to do in Limits to Capital. What's the difference?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Devine Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 5:13 PM To: Pen-l Subject: [Pen-l] David Harvey's new book. If you want a good book to help you understand Marx's CAPITAL, I highly recommend David Harvey's COMPANION TO MARX'S CAPITAL (2010). I haven't finished reading it, but so far (up to page 98 of 343), I have found that he is very successful at explaining CAPITAL as Marx himself saw it. That is, he doesn't force the book into some kind of Procrustean bed formed by neoclassical economics (as in "Analytic" Marxism), French structuralism, neo-Ricardianism, or any other perspective. That doesn't mean that Harvey always agrees with Marx. -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
