It's a bit more accessible. The book is actually a sort of loose transcription of his lectures on capital, which you can probably find on youtube or podcast on his website.
s On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 07:07, Max B. Sawicky <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like the same thing he is trying to do in Limits to Capital. > What's the difference? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Devine > Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 5:13 PM > To: Pen-l > Subject: [Pen-l] David Harvey's new book. > > If you want a good book to help you understand Marx's CAPITAL, I > highly recommend David Harvey's COMPANION TO MARX'S CAPITAL (2010). I > haven't finished reading it, but so far (up to page 98 of 343), I have > found that he is very successful at explaining CAPITAL as Marx himself > saw it. That is, he doesn't force the book into some kind of > Procrustean bed formed by neoclassical economics (as in "Analytic" > Marxism), French structuralism, neo-Ricardianism, or any other > perspective. That doesn't mean that Harvey always agrees with Marx. > -- > Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own > way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
