Carrol -- I think you are right a lot of the time, and often insightful even when I think you are wrong, but I swear to God you must have some version of this assigned to a macro on your computer. It's all well and good to note that such things live in contexts, but I would be much more interested in your thoughts on whether it was the right thing to do *in this context* than in your just saying we have to judge it within a specific context. I'll leave it up to you to decide how to frame the context. I also get Lance's point about finger-waving, but this is serious business, and I have to admit that it feels to me like dodging the question. Maybe that's me being bourgeois or something, but there it is.
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Carrol Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no such thing as a tactic which is either acceptable or > unaccptable in the absttract. Tactical judgment is wholly grounded in > specific contexts and has no meaning outside of some specific context. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
