for an obit, see http://www.economist.com/node/16214152

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Jim Devine <[email protected]> wrote:
> alas, Godley is deceased. But I'd guess that he's ignored because he's
> a Keynesian. Also, between 1950 and 1953, he was a  professional
> oboist.
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Michael Perelman
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I saw this about Hatzius, Goldman's chief economist, in the material Max
>> posted.
>>
>> Hatzius is one of the few top corporate economists who from his work with
>> Wynne Goddley really gets this.
>>
>> Why do so few people pay attention to Goddley?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:02:30PM -0400, Max Sawicky wrote:
>>> http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2010/07/hatzius_the_us.html
>>>
>>> Goldman Sachs economist, who I think is pretty good as these types go,
>>> forecasts restrictive fiscal policy dampening growth.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Perelman
>> Economics Department
>> California State University
>> Chico, CA 95929
>>
>> Tel. 530-898-5321
>> E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
>> michaelperelman.wordpress.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> pen-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jim Devine
> "All science would be superfluous if the form of appearance of things
> directly coincided with their essence." -- KM
>



-- 
Jim Devine
"All science would be superfluous if the form of appearance of things
directly coincided with their essence." -- KM
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to