Rakesh mentions John Bates Clark theory.  Actually, Clark had two
opposing theories.  For policy makers, he taught that trust, cartels
and monopolies were necessary to contain destructive competition.  For
workers, competition resulted in just outcomes.

I go into more details in The Invisible Handcuffs & Railroading Economics.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Lakshmi Rhone <[email protected]> wrote:
> "We do not really know if a US bus
> driver's wages are higher, in real terms ,i.e., in terms of purchasing power
> (which is what is socially relevant) than the wages of an Indian bus
> driver."
>
>
> Yes we do; it's much higher in $PPP. Tens of times higher. Econ I students
> still learn
> that it's basically true that all factors earn an amount equal to the value
> of what they
> contribute to output." And the wage is supposed to equal the marginal
> revenue product of labor, no?
>
> Ever since Clark this theory has supposed to make market-determined
> distribution seem fair.
> There are a lot of problems with this theory in terms of whether it adds up
> with non-constant returns to scale
> and whether it has empirical support and whether it can be formulated in an
> empirically testable manner.
>
> Leave that all aside. My point is that what gives the theory some practical
> resonance among the American working class
> are not the illusions of competition as Marx theorized but the protection
> afforded workers via restrictive immigration law.
>
> If wages were set in the absence of immigration control, workers would have
> no illusion that their earning reflects the value
> of what they contribute to output. I am not saying that in the absence of
> open borders the American working class is not exploited.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>



-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

530 898 5321
fax 530 898 5901
http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to