I don't disagree with your analysis. On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Carrol Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of michael perelman > Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 12:05 PM > To: Progressive Economics > Subject: Re: [Pen-l] civility > > Or, the problem is Democratic passivity that allows the Repugs. to > push things to the limit. & that passivity is because progressives > > You exactly reverse things. The 'problem' is Democratic aggressiveness that > leaves the Republicans no room on the right; hence the RP's either taking > 'crazy' positons or covering up its similarity to the DP with "crazy" > rhetoric. > > And this use of "Repugs," it seems to me, is a bit juvenile -- and adds up > to hiding the vicious policies of the DP, the DP being every bit as > repugnant as the RP. > > Carrol > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 530 898 5321 fax 530 898 5901 http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
