Hi Joseph,

I'm not going to spend too much time on your sermon of yesterday, but anyway 
you are badly mistaking my position. If you wanted to understand my 
position, you would need to be able to "think outside the box" in a 
non-discriminatory way.

In other words, just as with Louis Proyect, there is a whole universe of 
ideas outside the box of your own categorization system, but it is difficult 
for you to know that, because you are not used to think in any other way 
than you habitually and doctrinally do, and you think yourself to be "on top 
of the world". You are always within the safety of your own box, and you 
have your own "totalitarian catechism" of fixed categories to evaluate 
things.

I did not "identify the environmental cause with the bourgeois 
environmentalists" or "curse the idea of environmentalism". I do not "curse 
the Greens" generally. That is just lying nonsense. I don't care whether I'm 
perceived as "radical" or not, I'll leave that issue to fashion-followers.

My remarks about "jetsetting, SUV driving, designer kitchen Green knowledge 
bureaucrats" are based on my own personal experience of these people. They 
were really "jetsetting", including to Libya. They were really "SUV driving" 
techno-peasants with a hobby farm. They showed off to me their "designer 
kitchens" and fancy "stereo systems". They waffled about "consumerism" while 
they were using rich helpings of tax money and corporate money to embellish 
their lifestyle, deftly brushing away the more sordid aspects of their past. 
They very deliberately aimed to manipulate the use of knowledge, and gain 
control over things they had no experience of themselves.

Nor am I "disillusioned", mainly because I had few illusions to start of 
with. Of course, you hope that things will get better, and you know things 
could be worse. If things don't get better, but get worse instead, that's 
disappointing. But that is not a matter of being disillusioned.

In 1978 I was a freshman at university. From that year, after the election, 
the NZ Values Party actually rapidly fell apart. The Party had mooted the 
desirability of a "zero-growth society" but that zero-growth had arrived. 
Unemployment and price inflation were skyrocketing, and there was an 
investment strike by capitalists; the average rate of profit in industry had 
taken a nosedive. Nobody was interested anymore in Green idealism, they 
wanted job security and economic growth. The "red Greens" and the "green 
Greens" were at loggerheads with each other. The Party leader, Tony 
Kunowski, resigned, and became an investment banker.

As regards myself, I began to study Marx and Engels, and scholars like Harry 
Rothman, Barry Commoner, Andre Gorz, Boris Komarov, Vaclav Smil etc. and I 
rapidly evolved towards Marxism at that time. I wasn't really attracted much 
to the New Zealand versions of Maoists, Trotskyists, Hoxhaists, Castroists 
and Stalinists - as a sophomore I wrote a political science critique of 
official communism - but I had the opportunity (as bookstore employee around 
that time) to read Hal Draper, Roman Rosdolsky, Harry Braverman, Isaac 
Rubin, Ron Meek and various other writers who had a fairly thorough 
understanding of Marx and Engels. And that gave me a very different 
perspective on the environmental issues I was originally concerned with in 
my youth. Environmental issues are too important to leave to the Greens. 
After that I co-founded about four socialist groups, thankfully without any 
supervision from SWP dictators, and I was union delegate for some time.

The point of my comment about "regulation" is really that regulation is an 
intensely political game, whereby some actors aim to set limits on other 
actors. For that reason, it does not necessarily have any "liberating" or 
"emancipatory" qualities. "Green" is not necessarily "good". When you've 
worked for many government agencies like I have, you understand better why.

Towards the end of the 1990s, I realized clearly that, in reality, the New 
Left was now fully exhausted as a progressive political or intellectual 
tradition. It was pro-state and anti-freedom, and it kept spouting rhetorics 
about "movements" which did not exist. In working life, I have carefully 
verified my political interpretations. I worked across many years for many 
leftist officials and academics back-office, in many different capacities, 
so I learnt about their ways very directly, and in minute detail.

I've concluded, that in the end you have to decide whether you are for or 
against the New Marxist Exploiting Class. I was against them, and so I have 
only a few Marxian friends. But I don't mind about that, I don't like most 
"Marxists" anyway.

Jurriaan 


_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to