Bernanke's Do-Nothing [for non-financiers] Plan

The Fed chairman's grand scheme not to do anything about unemployment,
GDP growth, and gas prices.

By Annie Lowrey

Posted Thursday, April 28, 2011, at 2:06 PM ET

 If you are a trader, a bond investor, or a central banker, you
probably think that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's first
scheduled press conference went great. The professorly Bernanke—seated
behind a piano-sized table a comfortable distance from the
soft-balling journalists—seemed calm, if not confident. He did not say
anything stupid, strange, or newsworthy. The markets, as hoped, said,
"Whatever."

If you are the average person on the street, though, the conference
should have spooked you. Those who managed to suffer through heard
Bernanke sympathize with the common problems of common people—things
like rising gas prices and slow rates of job growth—but say that the
Federal Reserve's hands were  tied. Three years ago, when the banks
were in trouble, the Fed turned activist, dashing far outside its
traditional purview to stabilize the economy and shock it into growth.
But now, amid sluggish growth and a weak labor market, the Fed has
become a Fed of limits.

Take gas prices. The average American is paying $3.89 a gallon, up
from $2.89 just a year ago. Bernanke showed sympathy, noting that
"higher gas prices are absolutely creating a great deal of financial
hardship." But he described the problem as decidedly not his. "There's
not much the Federal Reserve can do about gas prices, per se, at least
not without derailing growth entirely. … After all, the Fed can't
create more oil."

Well, what about GDP growth? Bernanke mostly addressed the topic
during his opening remarks, an elaboration of a Federal Open Market
Committee statement released just before the press conference. He
noted that the median "longer run" projections for output growth range
from 2.5 to 2.8 percent. Those figures do not sound particularly good.
[and could easily be associated with rising official unemployment,
according to Okun's "Law."] The United States routinely saw 4-percent
annual growth in the 1990s—and we weren't catching up from a savage
recession then. But growth, too, was described as outside the Fed's
jurisdiction: "determined largely by non-monetary factors, such as the
rate of growth of the labor force and the speed of technological
change." Advertisement

What about joblessness? Surely the Fed has something to say about
that, given that full employment makes up one-half of the bank's dual
mandate? Bernanke said, "Progress toward more normal levels of
unemployment seems likely to be slow." He continued with this
not-so-rousing call: "We're going to have to, you know, continue to
watch and hope that we will get stronger and increasingly strong job
creation."

Binyamin Appelbaum of the New York Times pressed him: What could the
Fed do to bring the unemployment rate down, and why is it not doing
it? Bernanke declined to name what the Fed has in its toolbox that
might goose jobs growth. He instead described the bank's current and
past efforts to bring down the rate—dropping interest rates to zero,
and buying trillions of dollars in bonds to further convince
businesses to lend—as "extraordinary." Moving onto the other, unnamed
options would risk much-dreaded inflation: The "cost of that in terms
of employment loss in the future …would be quite significant."

Another journalist asked about long-term unemployment, a problem that
Bernanke has repeatedly expressed concern about in speeches and
testimony. Again, the central banker sounded worried. But he threw up
his hands. "As the situation drags on and as the long-term unemployed
lose skills and lose contact with the labor market or perhaps just
become discouraged and stop looking for work, then it becomes really
out of the scope of monetary policy," he said. "At that point, job
training, education, and other types of interventions would probably
be more effective." He continued: "We don't have any tools for
targeting long-term unemployment specifically."

Only when discussing inflation did Bernanke admit the Federal
Reserve's power—in this case, its near omnipotence. "In contrast to
economic growth and unemployment, the longer-run outlook for inflation
is determined almost entirely by monetary policy," he said. He
described the conditions that would require interest-rate hikes and
promised, "That will be the time that we need to begin to
tighten"—probably in a "couple of meetings."

Thus, on nearly every economic topic journalists raised, Bernanke
stressed the Fed's limits, rather than its capabilities. He argued
that the Fed has little control over issues affecting the average
person on the street at any given time. Sure, the Fed performed some
heroics during the worst of the credit crisis. But those days are
over.

Here's the thing: Bernanke is right about the Fed's specific
limitations. The bank wouldn't want to take on gas prices. Its
specific responsibility is not to maximize growth, but to keep prices
stable and unemployment low. The Fed can try to get businesses to
borrow and expand, and therefore to hire more workers. But it cannot
create 7 million jobs by any direct mechanism. And there is nothing
that the Fed can do for the long-term unemployed specifically.
Congress and the states have more and better resources for creating or
subsidizing work for the 99ers.

But there are plenty of things the bank could do to goose the economy
as a whole, with an eye to helping the labor market and the common
man. The Federal Reserve could undertake a third round of quantitative
easing, continuing to goad banks to lend to businesses and businesses
to take the loans. It could start declaring various "targets,"
promising the markets that it would change policy to meet them, no
matter what. It could stop paying interest on excess reserves—the
extra dollars that some banks keep parked at the Fed. It could even
charge banks for keeping the dollars there, incentivizing them to
deploy them in the real economy. It could say that it now considers 3
or 4 percent inflation a safe amount, not 2 percent—allowing its
easy-money policies to continue for longer.

Instead, the overwhelming message of the conference was that Bernanke
is worried about and plans on stamping out inflation when it picks up
even a little. On virtually every other front, he plans to do little
or nothing. On unemployment, especially, that is particularly
worrisome. It's good that the markets shrugged at the press
conference. But no regular citizen wants to hear her central banker
say, "Whatever."

-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to