How about Michal Kalecki's "The Political Aspects of Full Employment"?

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Eugene Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:

> Brad DeLong asked a question below.  When I read Abba Learner's The
> Economics of Control I had a brief period of elation, thinking the public
> sector could stabalize things.  But only a brief reflection explained why
> that can't work.  Private businesses stop the public sector from building
> and operating useful things.  Military spending is fine, almost everything
> else is off limits.  So, if I could understand this in three or four days,
> Marx probably was able to figure it out as well.
>
> Gene Coyle
>
> On May 3, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Brad DeLong wrote:
>
> The question remains. Given the absence of commercial crises and
> depressions in the AMP and the FMP, why wouldn't replicating the building of
> cathedrals, the building of aqueducts, or the conquest of Gaul stave off the
> crisis and so allow capitalism to engage in stable, balanced growth?
>
> Lenin writes that the conquest of Gaul does--but eventually you run out of
> Gauls. But that doesn't explain why the public sector can't stabilize things
> via non-military Keynesianism. To my knowledge Marx never provided an
> answer--but he was damned sure it wouldn't...
>
> Yours,
>
> Brad DeLong
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Doug Henwood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 3, 2011, at 1:08 PM, raghu wrote:
>>
>> > Apologies for the terrible subject-line, but I am curious about
>> > reactions to this critique of Marx's crisis theory by Bad DeLong
>>
>> This is what my late friend Bob Fitch liked to call Vol. 1 Marxism. Marx
>> wrote plenty about credit, and believed, among other things, that it helped
>> capitalism stretch beyond its boundaries.
>>
>> Doug
>> _______________________________________________
>> pen-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>>
>
> If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble,
> competent people on a level with dentists, that would be splendid!
>  _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
>


-- 
Sandwichman
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to