On 5/8/11 9:54 AM, Max Sawicky wrote:
> No doubt, though I was talking about Wiesenfeld.
>
>

They are all scumbags, for the most part. There is a huge contradiction 
in the board of trustees in just about every university in the country. 
People are selected primarily from the very financial industries and 
corporate law firms that see working people as the enemy.

http://www.yaleherald.com/archive/xxvi/10.2.98/news/benno.html
Ex-Yale President Schmidt draws fire in new position
By William S. Mauldin

Former Yale President Benno C. Schmidt, Jr., TC '63, LAW '66, has gone 
from the frying pan into the fire. A controversial figure throughout his 
tenure at Yale, Schmidt was appointed by New York City Mayor Rudolph 
Giuliani to chair the Advisory Task Force on the City University of New 
York (CUNY) on Wed., May 6. Many believe Schmidt's appointment is part 
of Giuliani's hotly contested agenda to end remedial education at CUNY.

Schmidt resigned from Yale in 1992 after six years marred by conflict. 
As president, he pushed through controversial and unpopular academic 
reforms such as a faculty hiring cap and drastic reduction in the 
sociology department in an effort to balance the University's budget and 
rebuild its infrastructure.

Since leaving Yale, Schmidt has served as chief executive officer of the 
Edison Project, a for-profit organization that manages public schools 
around the country. And now, CUNY has called on Schmidt to streamline 
their system. "I think there is no more important domestic issue than 
how to provide effective educational opportunity for all of our 
citizens," Schmidt said. He emphasized public schools' obligation to 
taxpayers to maintain high academic standards with the funds they receive.

Schmidt hopes to set specific standards for admission into CUNY. "There 
is a good deal of evidence that CUNY has not made clear to the New York 
public schools or leaders or students just what the standards are for 
admission to the college program," Schmidt commented. "It's hard to meet 
standards when people don't know what they are."

Schmidt's CUNY appointment comes at a crucial period in the history of 
the school system. CUNY's Board of Trustees has been debating whether to 
eliminate the school's remedial education programs in its senior schools 
for students who fail a placement test. Currently, almost all public 
universities in the country have some sort of remedial program, which 
makes CUNY's debate a hot political issue.

Many CUNY students are opposed to the elimination of remedial education. 
They argue that without remedial programs, it would be harder for 
foreign-born students to enter the CUNY system, since they often need 
help in English. "It's like shutting the door on immigrants," Mizanoor 
Biswas, chair of the University Student Center and a graduate of City 
College, said. Biswas himself is a native of Bangladesh--the school's 
student body is 49 percent foreign born.

The remedial programs also help the school's minority and older 
population. According to the school's Office of Institutional Research 
and Analysis, two-thirds of CUNY students are minorities, and only about 
seven percent graduate within four years. Biswas reported that the 
average graduating senior is 27 years old. Many fear that the 
elimination of remedial programs will prevent students who come from 
disadvantaged backgrounds or are returning to school after some time off.

Schmidt agrees that remedial programs are necessary to ensure access to 
CUNY for international and disadvantaged students. He maintained that he 
is committed to helping "urban youngsters, disadvantaged youngsters, and 
recent immigrants." But according to Schmidt, "The question is more, 
`Where should it take place?'"

Schmidt said that one solution to the remedial dilemma could be to 
privatize remedial programs. "I think [privatization] is an option," he 
explained. "[Privatizing education] can add to people's choices." He 
suggested that the school could subcontract the remedial program to a 
private educational service, such as Sylvan, Kaplan, or Berlitz. This 
could encourage competition among Catholic schools, CUNY, and public 
high schools.

But some are convinced that Schmidt's subcontracting plans could be just 
as damaging as removing the programs altogether. Susan O'Malley, 
professor of English at Kingsborough Community College and Secretary of 
the University Faculty Senate, fears that ending or privatizing remedial 
education would destroy CUNY's mission. "It will be a disaster if 
remediation is privatized," she said. "Something like 80 percent [of 
entering students] need at least one remedial course," O'Malley said. 
Biswas agreed that privatization is not the answer. "The institutions 
have a responsibility to New York," he said.

CUNY faculty and students worry what the fate of their university will 
be when the task force reports to the Mayor at the end of the year. Some 
fear the decision to end remedial education may have been made before 
the task force was created, and question the task force's autonomy from 
city hall. "The mayor has no love for City University," O'Malley said. 
But Schmidt maintained that the task force has no "formal connection" 
with the Board of Trustees, except for one member, Deputy Mayor Herman 
Bedillo.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to