This study needs a thorough public critique. It would be faster and most
credible if we assemble a group of economists to do so. I am overloaded with
other projects, but could help and do my part.  Living Wage Would Kill Jobs,
Cost Billions, Bloomberg Report Claims By Chris
Bragg<http://www.cityhallnews.com/newyork/articles.by.Author-23.html><http://www.cityhallnews.com/newyork/articles.by.Author-23.html>
http://www.cityhallnews.com/newyork/article-1879-living-wage-would-kill-jobs-cost-billions-bloomberg-report-claims.html

A living wage mandate for New York employers would stifle development, cost
tens of thousands of jobs, and sacrifice billions of dollars worth of
private investment in the decades to come, a controversial new study claims.

The long-awaited report from the city’s Economic Development Corporation
shows the City Council is pushing for the country’s most far-reaching living
wage protection, and says low-skilled workers would be disproportionally hit
by job losses.

“The most comprehensive study to date on the effect of living wage policy
shows that significant job losses accompany modest wage gains among
low-skilled workers,” said EDC spokesman David Lombino in a statement.
“For New York City, the study projects that the job loss would be even more
significant than other cities, and that many development projects,
particularly in areas outside Manhattan, would not move forward.”

The study was performed by the Boston-based firm Charles River Associates.

The living wage bill, sponsored by Council Member Oliver Koppell, would
require all employers in developments that receive more than $100,000 in
city subsidies to pay workers $10-per-hour if the employer pays health care
benefits, or $11.50 an hour if they do not.

Those conditions would apply to almost every commercial building in the
outer boroughs, said one person involved in the study, forcing almost every
business in them to pay a higher wage – making it much more sweeping than
laws in other cities.

For months, proponents of the living wage bill, which include the unions
RWDSU and 32 BJ, have anticipated that the $1 million EDC-funded study would
show that the bill would kill jobs and cost private investment.

One of the authors of the EDC study, Dr. David Neumark of
the University of California at Irvine, has been accused by proponents of
the bill as having a long history releasing reports
slanted<http://www.cityhallnews.com/newyork/article-1701-waging-war.html>
against
the adoption of wage mandates.

"The core question here is why New York can’t do what Los Angeles and San
Francisco have been doing for years: ask major businesses that receive
taxpayer-funded benefits to pay a living wage in return," said Paul Sonn,
legal co-director at the Washington, D.C.-based National Employment Law
Project, who authored the city's living wage bill.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg is already on record as being against the bill, and
spokesman Andrew Brent said the new report confirms why the mayor opposes
it.

“The biggest job losses would occur in the areas with the highest
unemployment at a time when too many New Yorkers are without jobs as it is,”
Brent said. “Aggregate wages among low-skilled workers would not change
because any gains among some workers would be more than offset by families
losing employment opportunities entirely.”

The living-wage bill is gearing up to be the next major clash between
progressives and the Bloomberg administration, following the death of the
paid-sick-leave bill, which Council Speaker Christine Quinn shelved
following a study funded by the Partnership for New York City that showed
the legislation would cost the city $789 million annually.

Quinn has not yet indicated whether she will allow the living wage bill to
the Council floor or whether she will support the legislation. The details
of the EDC study have emerged in advance of a Thursday hearing on the
bill<http://www.cityhallnews.com/newyork/article-1878-living-wage-advocates-set-sights-on-seven-key-council-members.html>.
The authors are not expected to testify.

Policy experts who favor the living wage bill are already working on a
rebuttal pointing out purported methodological flaws and miscalculations in
the EDC study.

Bettina Damiani, project director for Good Jobs New York, said it was
disappointing the city spent $1 million in taxpayers money to reaffirm the
real estate lobby's position on living wage.

"If working New Yorkers can’t count on earning a living wage," she said,
"what policy recommendations does the Bloomberg Administration plan to put
forward to lift workers out of poverty?"

A copy of the full 400-page study will likely be released in full this
summer.

Living Wage Exec Summary_2011 05
09<http://www.scribd.com/doc/55040124/Living-Wage-Exec-Summary-2011-05-09>
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to