Their cycle theories are of course different--Hayek's is monetary in nature (no money in Walras; no cycles in Walras; therefore cycles have to be explained by money), Schumpeter's theory focuses on the eventual deflationary effects of innovation initially financed by credit.
Wolfgang Stolper takes Schumpeter's side against Hayek because he thinks the latter is reactionary in a strict sense. He wants a return to Manchester liberalism though developments such as democratization and monopolization have made that objectively impossible. Schumpeter did not think Hayek clearly won the argument against Lange/Taylor. Well that's what I remember off the top of my head. LR
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
