Full at 
http://blog.cheapmotelsandahotplate.org/2011/06/14/the-emperor-has-no-clothes-but-still-he-rules-three-critiques-of-neoclassical-economics/
This appears in the June issue of Monthly Review.

 
Moshe Adler, Economics for the Rest of Us: Debunking the Science that Makes 
Life Dismal (New York: The New Press, 2009), 224 pages, $24.95, hardcover; 
David Orrell, Economyths: Ten Ways That Economics Get It Wrong (Mississauga, 
Ontario: John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd., 2010), 288 pages, $27.95, hardcover, 
$12.99, paperback (published London: Icon Books, 2010); Yanis Varoufakis, 
Joseph Halevi, and Nicholas J. Theocaratis, Modern Political Economics: Making 
Sense of the Post-2008 World (New York: Routledge, 2011, forthcoming), 536 
pages, $165.00, hardcover, $65.00, paperback.

 
Science is often thought to proceed from a theory to experiments that test its 
predictions. If new data are discovered that cannot be explained by the theory, 
eventually a new theory arises to replace it. If the new theory can explain 
everything the old one did plus the new phenomena, sooner or later every 
scientist will adhere to the new paradigm.

 
Neoclassical economics is taught at every college classroom in the United 
States and in almost every country in the world. Graduate students learn no 
other approach to economics. They are taught that neoclassical economics is a 
science, on a par with physics and the other natural sciences. There is even a 
joke that when good neoclassical economists die, they are reincarnated as 
physicists, but bad ones come back as sociologists. Economists take great pride 
in the fact that there is an award termed a "Nobel" in their discipline (It is 
called the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Science in Memory of Alfred 
Nobel"). This proves to them that economics is as applicable to society as 
physics is to the universe. There are, after all, immutable laws in both. The 
laws of demand and supply are no different, in principle, than the law of 
gravity. David Orrell, in Economyths, quotes Lawrence Summers as saying, 
"Spread the truth—the laws of economics are like the laws of engineering. One 
set of laws works everywhere."

 
But the authors of the three books under review deny categorically that 
neoclassical economics is a science. Economists have taken certain scientific 
concepts—such as equilibrium, stability, efficiency, feedback loops—and certain 
mathematical and statistical techniques and notions—such as calculus, 
probability, normal distribution, randomness, independence—and applied them to 
society in ways both inappropriate and simple-minded. Each of these writers 
concludes that, while economics has scientific pretensions, it is primarily an 
ideology that supports the interests of the rich and powerful, and in the 
process, confers prestige, influence, and money on its practitioners.

                                          
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to