Given that the anti-SS crowd will claim that whether true or not, what's the difference?
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 6:42 PM, michael perelman < [email protected]> wrote: > In the sort run, it is not regressive, but the long-run damage to > Social Security certainly is. Once the federal budget reimburses the > trust fund, the Repubs. will dispute that the program is self > supporting. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Robert Naiman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Whatever else may be true, cutting the payroll tax paid by workers is > > *not* "pretty regressive" - it's not regressive at all. I > > -- > Michael Perelman > Economics Department > California State University > Chico, CA > 95929 > > 530 898 5321 > fax 530 898 5901 > http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > -- Sandwichman
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
