it's always good to have evidence to cherry-pick, right? On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Sandwichman <[email protected]> wrote: > Given that the anti-SS crowd will claim that whether true or not, what's the > difference? > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 6:42 PM, michael perelman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In the sort run, it is not regressive, but the long-run damage to >> Social Security certainly is. Once the federal budget reimburses the >> trust fund, the Repubs. will dispute that the program is self >> supporting. >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Robert Naiman >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Whatever else may be true, cutting the payroll tax paid by workers is >> > *not* "pretty regressive" - it's not regressive at all. I >> >> -- >> Michael Perelman >> Economics Department >> California State University >> Chico, CA >> 95929 >> >> 530 898 5321 >> fax 530 898 5901 >> http://michaelperelman.wordpress.com >> _______________________________________________ >> pen-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > > > > -- > Sandwichman > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > >
-- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
