When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Eugene Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jim Devine wrote                 "It doesn't deal with the problem of low
> aggregate demand, though (like unemployment insurance)
> it may act as an automatic stabilizer."
>
> Jim, how do you know there is a problem of low aggregate demand?
>
> You see a staggering number of people unemployed and clearly you have
> assumed that the problem is low aggregate demand. On what do you base that
> assumption?
>
> What if the problem suggested by the staggering number of unemployed in the
> US is not low aggregate demand, but rather an excess supply of labor
> relative to the appropriate aggregate demand?
>
> If you were told that that is the problem that the macro level, what would
> your suggested solution be?
>
> And going back a step, what is the proper way to measure whether aggregate
> demand is low, high, or just right? If there are unemployed people in
> numbers above some conventional rule, do you conclude automatically that
> aggregate demand is low, without consideration of any other thing?
>
> Or should aggregate demand be compared with a measure of natural resources
> and or pollution sinks?
>
> Please tell me how you know whether aggregate demand is low, high, or just
> right.
>
> Gene Coyle
>
> > unemployment insurance) it may act as an automatic stabilizer."
>
> > It doesn't deal with the problem of low aggregate demand, though (like
> > unemployment insurance) it may act as an automatic stabilizer.
> On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Jim Devine wrote:
>
> > Sean Andrews wrote:
> >> So I realize that there is some intense debate about this--and I know
> >> I could search the archives to find out what it is about--but what, in
> >> short, is wrong with this kind of plan, at least as a short term
> >> measure?
> >
> > there's nothing wrong with it. It's also not especially wonderful
> > either. Job-sharing of this sort is a kind of unemployment insurance.
> > It doesn't deal with the problem of low aggregate demand, though (like
> > unemployment insurance) it may act as an automatic stabilizer. It does
> > lower _measured_ unemployment (as usually measured).
> > --
> > Jim Devine /  "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your
> > own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
> > _______________________________________________
> > pen-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>



-- 
Sandwichman
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to