On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Jim Devine <[email protected]> wrote:
> definitions are only introduction to > discussions (facilitating the development of theory) and should not be > taken out of context. Excuse me, then. I had the impression that you were deploying the definition in order to restrict the discussion along lines that would inevitably lead to your conclusion. It's ridiculously false analogy to compare a static measure (the excess > supply of labor-power) with a dynamic process. > Your next paragraph would seem to confirm my impression that the intent of the definition was to exclude alternative explanations. How on earth do you come to the conclusion that the excess supply of labor power is "static"?! I suppose you will tell me "it is axiomatic". -- Sandwichman
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
