On Oct 12, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Jim Devine wrote: > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Besides for what you were replied already, that has nothing to do with the >> "closed" nature (?) of Mac machines but with the fact that software makers >> don't feel like porting their code to the Mac > > attributing this decision to feelings suggests that there's no cost > involved in porting one's code to the Mac. Is that true?
Of course not. There is a cost and there is a return on investment. Especially so for so called "professional" software where licensing fees are quite high. In any case, the fact that such software does not run "natively" on Macs has nothing to do with Macs being "closed", whatever that means. JC _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
