Gosh, Chuck. My comment wasn't directed at you. Don't take it personally. All I was saying is a "list of demands" from a Truther website that ranks 9/11 investigation far above anything else is not "news." Capiche?
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Chuck Grimes <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > Bear shits in woods! Pope attends Catholic mass! > > ---------- > > That doesn't cut it Sandwich. Somebody forwards a list of highly suspicious > demands, how am I supposed to know it's just some conspiracy theorist bunk? > And I don't think you knew that list was bunk either. You thought it > displayed the stupidity of demands. > > If people forward bullshit, they need to label it bullshit. I don't want to > have to sort it out by guessing. > > There is another thing that is beginning to worry me. OWS communication > seems to be under a rather consistant form of disinformation attack. > > First, it was some complaint by radicious something about NA land, NA > voices not heard. Then SA and Bashkar's problem with a demands list getting > posted and disappeared, then the dragged out bullshit over the drummers, now > bogus demand lists. > > I read this list and LBO for honest information and analysis, I can't get > elsewhere. > > CG > > > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l > > -- Sandwichman
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
